> Every time I see something like this I roll my eyes... C++ doesn't have any "memory problems". You can choose which report you would prefer: Microsoft's, Goo

> Every time I see something like this I roll my eyes... C++ doesn't have any "memory problems". You can choose which report you would prefer: Microsoft's, Google's 65%, ... I'm sure they just hired bad developers that don't understand pointers. Sure, human problem, but if no human can use the tool correctly, then surely there is some problem with it. And no, that doesn't mean that memory unsafe languages don't have a place, but we really should have a very good reason for going down that road.