Neither from a "liguistic perspective" (as in linguistics), nor particularly wonderfully-writen. Worst, it's not even much of a takedown. "Let us assume that y

Neither from a "liguistic perspective" (as in linguistics), nor particularly wonderfully-writen. Worst, it's not even much of a takedown. "Let us assume that you are breaking the sixth rule itself. Then a fortiori (pardon my Latin) you can't be failing to break any of the rules sooner than saying something outright barbarous. Which means, contra assumption, that you aren't breaking the rule after all. Doh!" Pleeease, isn't it bloody obvious that the 6th meta-rule does not count?