6 ms·
Hmm, what if they expand this to charge for small credits for various other tools? Filters, brushes, etc.
by xwdv 3y ago
Hmm, what if they expand this to charge for small credits for various other tools? Filters, brushes, etc.
- Etheryte 3y agoPlease stop giving Adobe ideas.
- pphysch 3y agoERROR: 0.25oz of liquid remains in your Adobe™ x Mountain Dew™ Verification Can™. Please finish drinking to proceed using the software product. Thank you for your compliance.
- Traubenfuchs 3y agoAt this point you could just call it microtransaction. Imagine free, but extremely bare bones implementations of photoshop where anything but one brush and eraser is hidden behind individual or package deals.
- maxbond 3y agoOr you can buy a loot box of brushes.
- ThinkBeat 3y agoI was thinking the same thing. They have introduced the advanced filters in Photoshop. They display "running locally" (or something close to it) when used. I hope it won't be cloud only soon for even more $$$$$. For the subscription to even use PS, and then $ for using this or that feature.
- gitgud 3y agoIt only makes sense for things that run in the cloud, as they need to pay for that compute. Similar to costs “per request” in other cloud services like AWS. Although if Adobe did charge “per use” for locally run tools like brushes and filters… I’d hope they’d at least they’d make the billing completely “usage based” with no minimum monthly cost. But this is insane and evil, I’ll stick with Gimp and Inkscape