> Rather than a hammer manufacturer, I think a more apt analogy would be a publishing house. A publishing company can and should decide for itself what it will

> Rather than a hammer manufacturer, I think a more apt analogy would be a publishing house. A publishing company can and should decide for itself what it will or will not publish using whatever criteria it chooses. The reason for that is that publishing company have their name permanently attached to what it publishes. But that is not the case for ChatGPT, there is no signature attached to it and content can be used in way completely outside the control of the company.