4 ms·
Is that worth reading for someone casually interested in economics and its history? Or is it pretty dense and technical
by syndicatedjelly 3y ago
Is that worth reading for someone casually interested in economics and its history? Or is it pretty dense and technical
- rufus_foreman 3y agoThere are single sentences in that book that have half a dozen factual errors. So, you decide if that is worth reading.
- rubidium 3y agoI found it to be good for casual people economic history. Wasn’t overly “economics” in the technical sense.
- abdullahkhalids 3y agoIt is not technical at all. But it is more dense than a typical non-fiction book you read these days. Also heavily referenced like a scholarly work. I would highly recommend reading it, as it exposes you to the many biases in the orthodox framework of economic thought prevalent in the world today.