3 ms·
Ah, so I must solve all problems that impact my desired end state? This sounds perilously familiar, are you in my management chain? Like, snark aside, I said "
by eropple 3y ago
Ah, so I must solve all problems that impact my desired end state? This sounds perilously familiar, are you in my management chain?
Like, snark aside, I said "we", not "they", intentionally. There's a whole lot of people working on these problems. That these folks aren't targeting commercial shipping does not mean in the slightest that it's not happening. When I go to town meetings and say "hey, high-density housing is good for [town]!", it's not somehow less legitimate that I'm not going to the next town over and advocating for it there, too.
- scarface_74 3y agoAgain, they specifically said they are going after them because “Cruises don’t serve any purpose”. It’s like saying we are going after cigarettes for causing cancer. But not going after asbestos because cigarettes “don’t serve a purpose”. No matter how you try to spin it, it’s a stupid argument.
- Aerroon 3y agoIt's not about "solving" the problem. It's about taking away something people enjoy that you happen to not care about. If we take this to its logical conclusion then everything you do for enjoyment will also call under the umbrella of "no utilitarian value".