2 ms·
There is nothing to lose by declassifying and releasing the "high definition videos" that NASA's head and AARO's director talk about. Are you opposed to that? I
by david-gpu 3y ago
There is nothing to lose by declassifying and releasing the "high definition videos" that NASA's head and AARO's director talk about. Are you opposed to that? If you are, can you elaborate?
- Avshalom 3y agoI'm not opposed, broadly speaking I don't really support the idea of classified or secret information at all (in like a government context, I'm not going to tell you my birthday and social#) It just won't do anything. And it's really obvious that it won't do anything.
- crustaceansoup 3y agoThey're usually classified because they reveal information on sensor capabilities, NASA's director talked about that at the press conference.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- david-gpu 3y agoAnd yet they are able to declassify some of them. Why only declassify three blurry dots in 2017 and one blurry sphere in 2022 when according to AARO they have about a thousand reports, including fifty sightings showing "anomalous" characteristics? The rather mundane-looking blurry stuff released in 2017 was captured using military equipment and it didn't stop them.
- crustaceansoup 3y agoDidn't GOFAST/GIMBAL and the Nimitz tic-tac video leak? That could have given them convenient choices to look like they were cooperating. Could they be covering something up? I can't say it's impossible. I'm just saying that between the tendency towards overclassification, the UFO stigma, and seemingly legimitate counterintel concerns, it doesn't seem like this refusal is evidence of a cover-up in and of itself.
- david-gpu 3y agoI agree 100%