4 ms·
>Nothing in the author's linked story suggests this code is not MIT licensed as the repo claims. The lack of him saying he went to the effort of having Box or
by austhrow743 3y ago
>Nothing in the author's linked story suggests this code is not MIT licensed as the repo claims.
The lack of him saying he went to the effort of having Box or Uber license their code MIT suggests it.
- sneak 3y agoYou seem to be using an absence of evidence as evidence of absence. There's nothing to explicitly suggest that either is the rightsholder; that is another assumption, which is directly counter to the fact that the person who wrote the code posted it alongside an MIT license.