2 ms·
hmm i hadn't thought of a ban scenario. A little google led me here https://stackoverflow.com/a/66105692/3875151 https://stackoverflow.com/a/66105692/3875151, i
by preciousoo 3y ago
hmm i hadn't thought of a ban scenario. A little google led me here https://stackoverflow.com/a/66105692/3875151 https://stackoverflow.com/a/66105692/3875151, it seems like the user will live on as long as github continues to shadow ban them.
Now I wonder what their involvement with the archive.is team is, the nixos folk seem really pissed off by his removal.
Edit I guess the law was involved somehow. Still doesn't answer why they're logged into archive.is, and how archive.is is able to save their account state, even though github 'disappeared' them: https://web.archive.org/web/20210116151808/https://twitter.com/grhmc/status/1350461787313999872 https://web.archive.org/web/20210116151808/https://twitter.c...
https://discourse.nixos.org/t/how-was-this-treewide-pr-performed/11174/14 https://discourse.nixos.org/t/how-was-this-treewide-pr-perfo...
- preciousoo 3y agoLast note: according to other internet sleuths, this user runs/is closely connected to those who run archive.is https://gyrovague.com/tag/archive-is/ https://gyrovague.com/tag/archive-is/ https://cirosantilli.com/china-dictatorship/archive-today https://cirosantilli.com/china-dictatorship/archive-today https://webapps.stackexchange.com/a/149405 https://webapps.stackexchange.com/a/149405