4 ms·
Call it "limited open source" or something, but the dishonesty leaves a worse taste than admitting it's not open source.
by generalizations 3y ago
Call it "limited open source" or something, but the dishonesty leaves a worse taste than admitting it's not open source.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- karim79 3y agoThree pricing tiers and no listed prices on the "pricing" page. Only the option to talk to sales. So, depending on the outcome of the conversation one could end up paying less for the Enterprise tier than for the Basic one. No single indicator of a starting/base price.
- SubiculumCode 3y agoWell, I admit that I now feel bad for posting it to HN; I should have looked at the actual details of the license rather than the headline they are trying to sell.
- calderknight 3y agoJust call it what it is: proprietary, nonfree software
- demarq 3y agoThis doesn’t make sense, they don’t control Meta. They have absolutely nothing to do with that part of the license