4 ms·
> permissively licensed, open-source foundation LLM Sounds great > This license is, in part, based on the LLAMA 2 Community License Agreement, with a series o
by slimsag 3y ago
> permissively licensed, open-source foundation LLM
Sounds great
> This license is, in part, based on the LLAMA 2 Community License Agreement, with a series of modifications. Use of DeciLM for hosted services may require a separate license.
Ah, so a bait-and-switch. It's not open source, and not permissively licensed.
- generalizations 3y agoCall it "limited open source" or something, but the dishonesty leaves a worse taste than admitting it's not open source.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- karim79 3y agoThree pricing tiers and no listed prices on the "pricing" page. Only the option to talk to sales. So, depending on the outcome of the conversation one could end up paying less for the Enterprise tier than for the Basic one. No single indicator of a starting/base price.
- SubiculumCode 3y agoWell, I admit that I now feel bad for posting it to HN; I should have looked at the actual details of the license rather than the headline they are trying to sell.
- calderknight 3y agoJust call it what it is: proprietary, nonfree software
- demarq 3y agoThis doesn’t make sense, they don’t control Meta. They have absolutely nothing to do with that part of the license
- jules22 3y agoThey seem to have edited out "open-source" now. Still, a free for personal use model is better than none. Hopefully, we will soon have some adaptation from Llama 2 that matches it, fairly soon.