> in a scientific article, this is insane language to use and really calls into question the assumptions and conclusions. Springer Nature would appear to disag

> in a scientific article, this is insane language to use and really calls into question the assumptions and conclusions. Springer Nature would appear to disagree with your assertion. "Authors should use the terms sex (biological attribute) and gender (shaped by social and cultural circumstances) carefully in order to avoid confusing both terms. Article titles and/or abstracts should indicate clearly what sex(es) the study applies to. Authors should also describe in the background, whether sex and/or gender differences may be expected; report how sex and/or gender were accounted for in the design of the study; provide disaggregated data by sex and/or gender, where appropriate; and discuss respective results. If a sex and/or gender analysis was not conducted, the rationale should be given in the Discussion. These guidelines apply to studies involving humans, vertebrate animals and cell lines." https://www.springernature.com/gp/policies/book-publishing-policies#:~:text=Authors%20should%20use,and%20cell%20lines https://www.springernature.com/gp/policies/book-publishing-p....