> I have to question to the value of looking over existing papers given the current replication crises, is using an LLM to review existing papers just going to

> I have to question to the value of looking over existing papers given the current replication crises, is using an LLM to review existing papers just going to enable us to do more bad science faster? It might be worse than that, not only might ChatGPT uncritically accept authors' claims or reduce the effort to produce low-quality research - given the current state of the art, there seems to be no guarantee that LLMs won't claim things about a paper that was never even said.