2 ms·

Ok! So that makes sense. These are people with some credibility and authority. Why the hell is this not mentioned in the article in favor of their former jobs?

• syndicatedjelly 3y ago
  Because the content of an argument should trump the last title someone held?
  • jncfhnb 3y ago
    That may apply to logical debate, but it does not apply to persuasive writing nor interesting reporting. Writing about a person and providing background information about their former job but not about the facts that make them pertinent to the subject matter is dumb.
• ebiester 3y ago
  It's an article written by someone outside the community with low context, and likely for $20 or something similar. It's a low quality article.