His points aren't just about historical accuracy, they are also on value and language (being an unmitigated pedant, he would for example also probably object to

His points aren't just about historical accuracy, they are also on value and language (being an unmitigated pedant, he would for example also probably object to something being called a "hot water heater"). I believe his points on historical accuracy are actually more about physics consistency although he does explain some of the confusion away with the mistaken Victorian historical assumptions.