Since most readers will be archaeological lay-people, would it have been so difficult for the article to have at least outlined some of these (supposed) drawing

Since most readers will be archaeological lay-people, would it have been so difficult for the article to have at least outlined some of these (supposed) drawings? There is such a thing as pareidolia, the tendency to want to see meaningful imagery in what are just random patterns... (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pareidolia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pareidolia)