4 ms·
Neither of those references are about writing in cursive. They are about writing with hand vs typing. Any benefit found will still be there if people use print
by true_religion 3y ago
Neither of those references are about writing in cursive. They are about writing with hand vs typing.
Any benefit found will still be there if people use print letters; or scribble fast shorthand.
- retrac 3y agoBeginner typing is a discrete muscle action, under conscious control and attention. Hunt for, or try to remember, where the letter is. Hit the key. Then the next. Sort of jerky. Letter by letter. Fluent typing is a more composite act, a sort of dance where the fingers roll back and forth in combined motions efficiently. Not coincidentally, fluent typists are prone to mixing up words like "fluid" and "fluent", as I just did and had to correct. Type entire words or phrases correctly, incorrectly. Often they sound similar or have a similar semantic sense. Slightly fuzzy erroneous activation, of ingrained muscle memory patterns, is my interpretation of that effect. A similar level of fluency emerges with handwriting over time. One stops forming individual letters, and whole sequences become one extended flow of the pen. Entire words. It detaches the executive function and short term memory and attention of the mind, from the flow of individual letters and how words are spelled and put together. That becomes an automatic process. We might want to encourage that fluency in more than one mode.
- true_religion 3y agoWhy would we want that fluency in more than one mode? Isn’t print lettering enough? It’s not as if more is better. Sometimes more is just more to learn and not have time for other things.