4 ms·
That whole case seems like a mess. > It was later discovered by The New Republic that Smith had made a wedding website for a heterosexual couple in 2015, which
by hiatus 3y ago
That whole case seems like a mess.
> It was later discovered by The New Republic that Smith had made a wedding website for a heterosexual couple in 2015, which had been removed from her business's profile prior to her filing the case but remained visible in the Wayback Machine archives
https://www.theguardian.com/law/2023/jul/25/lgbtq-rights-supreme-court-case-wedding-site https://www.theguardian.com/law/2023/jul/25/lgbtq-rights-sup...
- leereeves 3y agoOf course it was removed from her business's profile. Under Colorado law she wasn't allowed to offer to create any wedding sites unless she was willing to create LGBT wedding sites. She wasn't, so she removed references to wedding sites. Why do you find that strange?