> cats are deadly to many smaller species that's why if you're against that then you shouldn't get a cat at all. Many people who have cats do so by adoption of

> cats are deadly to many smaller species that's why if you're against that then you shouldn't get a cat at all. Many people who have cats do so by adoption of strays found in their area so not getting a cat is the same as letting a cat roam free in that area without a safe space and consistent food source. The whole "prisoner" argument seems so dumb to me when we've already decided as a society that it's in the best interests of society to neuter/spay as many cats and dogs as possible to prevent an explosion in the stray population. Do you think we shouldn't do that because you wouldn't neuter/spay yourself?