3 ms·

That needs better naming in my opinion. Just sender and receiver would be enough IMO. Maybe it is just me but it is unusual to see origin used in this context

That needs better naming in my opinion. Just sender and receiver would be enough IMO. Maybe it is just me but it is unusual to see origin used in this context even if it is technically correct I only ever see it used with CDNs and load balancing.

benburleson 3y ago
I’ve always referred to those client/server.
- leetrout 3y ago
  I think webhooks are even more misleading because they are server to server.
  - janci 3y ago
    And the client is actually the sender.
hermanradtke 3y ago
I was frustrated with my naming too. > technically correct I only ever see it used with CDNs and load balancing That is why I used it! I responded in https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37525971 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37525971 that maybe I should change it. Sender/receiver is better.