It strikes me as a bit disengenuous to claim that you're going hard on license enforcement because "type designers are not fairly compensated for their work if

It strikes me as a bit disengenuous to claim that you're going hard on license enforcement because "type designers are not fairly compensated for their work if their fonts are not properly licensed". While this might be a true statement generally, type designers don't actually own the fonts that fall under the "TTF umbrella", do they? Aren't they all now owned by you? So you and your private equity investors are the ones reaping the profits when you act aggressively on license enforcement, and not the designer/s? And by not being clear about this, you're ironically giving independent type designers a bad name by leading people to believe that it's the designers driving these efforts?