3 ms·

Great question. The reason is that my documents do get updated. This is not merely an archive as I also store various more live documents in it like budgets, et

Great question. The reason is that my documents do get updated. This is not merely an archive as I also store various more live documents in it like budgets, etc. Some documents are indeed purely archived. But even for those, I find it really handy to have a complete log of when they were added. Who added them, etc. All this is stored in SVN. Also, SVN provides a really easy way to sync the folder to various devices (svn CLI tool on Linux and Mac, and TortoiseSVN on Windows clients). I am aware that nowadays, SVN is not the modern choice compared to Git. When I designed this system, Git was not available. But I actually find that SVN's centralized architecture fits really well for this purpose. For photos, I really like having them in SVN as I never lose any image even if I modify it. Sure, it takes up a little extra storage. But storage is cheap. Also, SVN here acts as an extra local backup.

EvanAnderson 3y ago
I've used SVN in a similar capacity for personal and business use, and even at some of my Customers. It's very handy and TortoiseSVN provides a good user experience. I got into doing this back in 2004 and even though Git might be a better tool today (maybe) I've stuck with SVN.
tda 3y ago
At a previous employer, we stored 3Tb of data in SVN. The data was mostly archival, however sometimes corrections were made to historical data. Using partial checkouts it was quite easy to sync a subset locally. I don't use subversion anymore, but thinking about it I prefer the explicit and deliberate commit/checkout/merge over the automagic sync conflict generators that are onedrive, dropbox, nextcloud etc. Also all pf these start to struggle somewhere around 100k files / 1TB data mark.