> Great, I'm glad you agree the labour theory of value is unable to explain and is unlikely to be valid. You know that I didn't write anything in that regards

> Great, I'm glad you agree the labour theory of value is unable to explain and is unlikely to be valid. You know that I didn't write anything in that regards and that you are - using sophistry - putting words under my fingertips. This feels to me like you are not actually interested in coming to a shared understanding but more in "scoring points" in a discussion. This makes me quite sad, because that's something that I would expect from a discussion on Reddit or Twitter, but not on HN.