> Doesnt the title imply using words monopolists use is evidence of something? Surely thats not what defines a monopoly. You’d have to look at actual actions.

> Doesnt the title imply using words monopolists use is evidence of something? Surely thats not what defines a monopoly. You’d have to look at actual actions. Who says they're not both looking at what Google says and what it does? Proving that Google both has questionable practices and tries to hide them is an argument that Google not only does questionable things but also that Google is aware it's doing questionable things.