3 ms·
That sounds overstated. https://www.notebookcheck.net/AMD-Ryzen-9-7940HS-analysis-Zen4-Phoenix-is-ideally-as-efficient-as-Apple.713395.0.html https://www.noteb
by diffeomorphism 3y ago
That sounds overstated.
https://www.notebookcheck.net/AMD-Ryzen-9-7940HS-analysis-Zen4-Phoenix-is-ideally-as-efficient-as-Apple.713395.0.html https://www.notebookcheck.net/AMD-Ryzen-9-7940HS-analysis-Ze...
Current laptop AMD chips have about the same efficiency as M2 Pro, when throttled to similar wattage (see the section about 35W). Instead they default to more power and being more powerful, while being vastly cheaper (M2 Pro Mac mini with 32gb of ram and 2tb of SSD costs what?).
So yeah, for a laptop chip apple is ahead, but it is pretty easy to overstate by how much.
- sharedbeans 3y ago??? How is this supported by your article? Looking at the only perf/watt benchmark (Cinebench ST), they show: M2 Pro @ 141 points/watt Ryzen 9 7940HS @ 47 points/watt
- senknvd 3y ago> when throttled to similar wattage (see the section about 35W)