4 ms·

The comparison on the homepage is not even close to fair. They compare a React component from a headless UI library that has a lot of (accessibility) features a

The comparison on the homepage is not even close to fair. They compare a React component from a headless UI library that has a lot of (accessibility) features and full TypeScript typing to a basic version without any typing. > The amount of code required to build a basic listbox UI component That is not what is being compared. The speed graph shows the amount of HTML/CSS/JS on the project home page. Again not even close to a fair comparison, they have completely different content. I can create a sluggish library, with a homepage that is just a plain text link to a GitHub repo and that would rank way higher.

jampekka 3y ago
Isn't basic version without any typing being shorter and clearer a fair comparison of JS against TS?
- sprkv5 3y ago
  For a fair comparison they should have compared the React JS implementation with Nue.
- lolinder 3y ago
  Not if it does a fraction of the work. The current comparison basically says "look what you can do if you don't have to worry about accessibility or supporting multiple use cases!"