2 ms·
Or maybe it was just a long, sequential algorithm where breaking it up wouldn't have been an improvement.
by goatlover 3y ago
Or maybe it was just a long, sequential algorithm where breaking it up wouldn't have been an improvement.
- auggierose 3y agoI have been programming for more than 30 years. Except for code generated explicitly to be only consumed by machine, I've never come across a function consisting of 2000 lines of code that should not have been broken up. Something is wrong there, and if you show me the code, I'll tell you what's wrong with it.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]