3 ms·
The only reason is amd partnership, not overall performance gain. Things may smooth out in upcoming months/years as they patch it.
by saiya-jin 3y ago
The only reason is amd partnership, not overall performance gain. Things may smooth out in upcoming months/years as they patch it.
- paulmd 3y agoAMD seems to have moved to a “gameworks” style business model where all their sponsored titles run like crap, but they run more like crap on the competition (and increasingly lock out intel entirely etc, as Bethesda has refused to support these etc). And this goes beyond just starfield. Ok, Bethesda sucks. Jedi Survivor ran like crap too.. does respawn suck? TLOU ran like crap too, does naughty dog suck too? Harry potter ran like shit too. And TLOU is not even a new game! I’m very curious what exactly is going on with the devrel side of AMD’s sponsorship of these titles. What assistance is AMD providing with their sponsorship, and what is the nature of what they are willing to do and not do in terms of the optimizations etc? Maybe this pipeline bubble stuff is the result of something AMD is pushing for consoles, and they just don’t care about the effect it has on PCs (even their own) or they actively encourage it.