3 ms·
> They also help, by identifying bad teachers and bad schools. Not really. Here in Chicago, the Noble charter high schools will often teach directly to the AC
by spamizbad 15y ago
> They also help, by identifying bad teachers and bad schools.
Not really. Here in Chicago, the Noble charter high schools will often teach directly to the ACT. This results in some dramatic boosting of ACT scores, with some schools taking kids from the dysfunctional CPS System and getting a school average of 23. Unfortunately, once they reach college, they see little academic success despite being straight-A students with 25+ ACT scores.
This has a detrimental impact on the curriculum:
1) The English program structured heavily around basic reading comprehension, with little to no emphasis on writing composition. A students understanding of essay composition s roughly: "Organize the things you want to talk about into paragraphs... then write a conclusion." However, to their credit, they're really good at reading test questions.
2) Math is focused on teaching Pre-algebra fundamentals and then layering on test-specific Algebra, Geometric (with that goofy proof system), and basic Trig. It's a sad, narrow sample of our already sad & narrow HS math curriculum. It covers few "advanced" Algebra and Trig subjects. This means anyone who has to take "college math" will need courses in Trig and Precalc in college, with the possibility of an Algebra refresher course before proceeding.
3) Social Studies and Science? All rote-to-test. Students are drilled on step-by-step procedures on how to interpret graphs that'll score correctly on tests... without giving them actual knowledge on how to critically think about information - be it historical or scientific.
NCLB schools do the same song-and-dance, except with a much less rigorous test. If you've actually seen the questions on most NCLB tests, you'd be disappointed. Unfortunately, the composition of such tests is so political and messy it's impossible to provide any measure of quality.
You cannot assume testing will provide you accurate information or a better outcome for students. If you're going to implement a testing regiment, you need to be very mindful of the Observer Effect: You can very easily change the outcome by measuring it. This is not an easy problem to solve.
- yummyfajitas 15y agoYour issue is with the objectives of the school system, not testing. Tests measure whether a school meets it's objectives, they don't define the objectives. Similarly, if your manager writes a bunch of nonsensical unit tests, it's ridiculous to blame unit testing if you wind up building the wrong product.
- rbarooah 15y agoTests are the only thing defining the objectives. They may not reflect the intended goals, but passing the test is the only objective, and that is why standardized tests can undermine education.
- yummyfajitas 15y agoTests are what hold people accountable for meeting the objectives, they don't define them. Why do you feel that not holding teachers accountable for meeting the objectives of their school system will improve education? I agree that some schools may have bad goals, but why do you believe teachers/admins have better ones?
- rbarooah 15y agoNo - tests define the objectives - they serve as an operational definition. The rest is just description and explanation. The second two sentences have nothing to do with anything I said.