3 ms·

Thank you! You are right: Nue takes inspiration from Vue 2.0, petite-vue and Riot. I'll make the comparison more fair, but it doesn't take out the fact that R

Thank you! You are right: Nue takes inspiration from Vue 2.0, petite-vue and Riot. I'll make the comparison more fair, but it doesn't take out the fact that React/Vue promote use of "spaghetti" code where logic/layout/styling are mixed together making the code hard to read and causes the size to grow. Everywhere I look the projects are unnecessarily big. Very often in the factor of 10x too big. Pretty sure Nue JS will always need a build step. I don't like the idea to load the compiler and run JS exec() on the client side. Heavy and unsecure. Haven't checked performance yet. I want to see this project getting more traction before deep diving to benchmarking

hackerman_fi 3y ago
I jumped straight to comparison (as it’s listed first) and was let down because the comparison seemed borderline deceiving. The other examples had hundreds of lines of logic and types for example.
- spoiler 3y ago
  Also, it was comparing a headless library with a concrete (and rigid) implementation. You could use the a similar amount of React code to get the same concrete implementation. Probably not intentionally deceitful, but it a ridiculous comparison.
niutech 3y ago
Having a zero-build-step bundle is a quick & easy way to experiment with a library and add simple interactions to existing static HTML websites, which is a big plus. However, according to BundleJS, only nuejs-core's compile() method is 36.2KB minified gzipped: https://deno.bundlejs.com/badge?q=nuejs-core@0.1.0&treeshake=%5B%7B+compile+%7D%5D https://deno.bundlejs.com/badge?q=nuejs-core@0.1.0&treeshake... - it is nowhere close to 2.3KB as on your website. Compare it to petite-vue's bundle, which is only 7.3KB: https://deno.bundlejs.com/badge?q=petite-vue@0.4.1 https://deno.bundlejs.com/badge?q=petite-vue@0.4.1
- tipiirai 3y ago
  petite-vue is about 3x bigger than Nue. here's the script: https://nuejs.org/@nue/js/nue.js https://nuejs.org/@nue/js/nue.js local gzip on my machine is 2.3kb
  - niutech 3y ago
    Yes, but it's only the Nue runtime which is 2.3KB, the compiler bundle is 36KB. Petite Vue includes everything in 7KB.

hackerman_fi 3y ago

I jumped straight to comparison (as it’s listed first) and was let down because the comparison seemed borderline deceiving. The other examples had hundreds of lines of logic and types for example.

spoiler 3y ago
Also, it was comparing a headless library with a concrete (and rigid) implementation. You could use the a similar amount of React code to get the same concrete implementation. Probably not intentionally deceitful, but it a ridiculous comparison.

niutech 3y ago

Having a zero-build-step bundle is a quick & easy way to experiment with a library and add simple interactions to existing static HTML websites, which is a big plus. However, according to BundleJS, only nuejs-core's compile() method is 36.2KB minified gzipped: https://deno.bundlejs.com/badge?q=nuejs-core@0.1.0&treeshake=%5B%7B+compile+%7D%5D https://deno.bundlejs.com/badge?q=nuejs-core@0.1.0&treeshake... - it is nowhere close to 2.3KB as on your website. Compare it to petite-vue's bundle, which is only 7.3KB: https://deno.bundlejs.com/badge?q=petite-vue@0.4.1 https://deno.bundlejs.com/badge?q=petite-vue@0.4.1

tipiirai 3y ago
petite-vue is about 3x bigger than Nue. here's the script: https://nuejs.org/@nue/js/nue.js https://nuejs.org/@nue/js/nue.js local gzip on my machine is 2.3kb
- niutech 3y ago
  Yes, but it's only the Nue runtime which is 2.3KB, the compiler bundle is 36KB. Petite Vue includes everything in 7KB.