3 ms·
> has its share of… Interesting choices Curious to hear more.
by bch 3y ago
> has its share of… Interesting choices
Curious to hear more.
- vkazanov 3y agoWell, nothing truly horrible but here are things I find inconvenient (but working nevertheless) when using the sdk. 1. NodeJS-based utilities. The tooling around js doesn't lean itself well to integration with with the dev's environment. 2. The sdk itself is a mix of Rust, javascript and C. I'd say that this is at least one language too many - makes it harder to contribute. Ideally such fundamental projects should be as simple and homogeneous as possible. 3. I keep wondering if generating languages other than C should be supported. The core idea of the library is brilliant either way so it sort of compensates all of the above.