3 ms·

> That wasn't even true when open source got started. Which is why it took off when computers became accessible; and continued growing with even further ubiqui

> That wasn't even true when open source got started. Which is why it took off when computers became accessible; and continued growing with even further ubiquity. > You also might not need your own. A project gets started by someone who does have access to a decent FPGA, you want to contribute to it, great. They give you remote access to the FPGA. Cool, so we're back to bottlenecked accessibility. > Which is available to anyone, if you have customer demand. Not hobbyists. To reiterate, open hardware (including ISAs) is as old as open software. You're delusional if you think either are anywhere equivalent.

AnthonyMouse 3y ago
> Which is why it took off when computers became accessible; and continued growing with even further ubiquity. So things like FPGA prices going down over time or being available to hobbyists via cloud providers. > Cool, so we're back to bottlenecked accessibility. Anyone with a computer and an internet connection can contribute, all they have to do is send an email to the project maintainers. It's obviously not as good as everybody already having the hardware, but it could be good enough to actually make it happen. > Not hobbyists. The model would be that there is a public repository with a design in it, anyone can contribute, and then every year or two they do a freeze and a production run which anyone can buy including the hobbyists who made contributions. It feels like your argument is that Debian can't exist because a hobbyist doesn't have the resources to build a whole operating system. One doesn't, but a million of them do, especially if they can start with a basic design released by a major corporation or university or government.