3 ms·

I'm based on facts, have shown/linked many references that prove what I'm saying. You keep spreading lies and/or denying reality. An Infectious Disease Doctor c

by Xunjin 3y ago

I'm based on facts, have shown/linked many references that prove what I'm saying. You keep spreading lies and/or denying reality. An Infectious Disease Doctor called Luana Araújo in a Congress Commission once said[0]: “We're discussing which edge of the flat Earth we're going to jump off.” That's literally your approach to discussing all matters in this thread. Reference: 0. https://g1.globo.com/politica/noticia/2021/06/02/estamos-discutindo-de-que-borda-da-terra-plana-vamos-pular-diz-medica-sobre-tratamento-precoce.ghtml https://g1.globo.com/politica/noticia/2021/06/02/estamos-dis...

matheusmoreira 3y ago
Not only did you post links that don't actually disprove or deny anything I said, sometimes you posted links that actually enhanced my arguments. Your excerpt for example makes the persecution of Bolsonaro obvious to everyone on this site. "Abuse of political power"? What made up nonsense is this? That's ridiculous. It's just like the totally arbitrary fines and censorship they imposed on Google for the crime of posting a link on their own homepage. "Abuse of market position" they called it. It's painfully obvious that these judges wanted to destroy the guy. One judge even bragged about it in public. Unashamedly. Who's denying reality? Your posts border on gaslighting. The link you just posted is yet another example. I was a very vocal critic of Bolsonaro's handling of the pandemic during his mandate. So I actually agree with what Dr. Luana Araújo said in that news article. That's why I think it's hilarious that of all the dumb things he said and did he went down for his perfectly valid criticism of the electronic voting machines.
- Xunjin 3y ago
  At least in the pandemic, you seem to be reasonable. In many posts, you have shown no knowledge of Law concepts and how our constitution works. I hope in the future, before you say a “judge is being a dictator”, you study about the matter. IANAL, and yet I'm capable to see how you don't know about the typical and atypical functions of each power in our Democracy. I hope this link could expand your superficial knowledge about the matter. https://www.jusbrasil.com.br/noticias/podem-os-juizes-legislar/3040265 https://www.jusbrasil.com.br/noticias/podem-os-juizes-legisl...
  - matheusmoreira 3y ago
    What constitution? The one the judges selectively apply? The one that explicitly says the political censorship they perpetrated is unconstitutional? You're apparently incapable of seeing the fact that the judges have essentially given themselves power to legislate, investigate and judge. They've been doing it ever since one particular publication attacked them and they show no signs of stopping any time soon. It was painfully obvious during the election but it started much earlier than that. https://www.conjur.com.br/2022-nov-27/inquerito-fake-news-stf-relacao-justica https://www.conjur.com.br/2022-nov-27/inquerito-fake-news-st... If you can't see this, it's pointless to continue this thread.

by Xunjin 3y ago

matheusmoreira 3y ago

Not only did you post links that don't actually disprove or deny anything I said, sometimes you posted links that actually enhanced my arguments. Your excerpt for example makes the persecution of Bolsonaro obvious to everyone on this site. "Abuse of political power"? What made up nonsense is this? That's ridiculous. It's just like the totally arbitrary fines and censorship they imposed on Google for the crime of posting a link on their own homepage. "Abuse of market position" they called it. It's painfully obvious that these judges wanted to destroy the guy. One judge even bragged about it in public. Unashamedly. Who's denying reality? Your posts border on gaslighting. The link you just posted is yet another example. I was a very vocal critic of Bolsonaro's handling of the pandemic during his mandate. So I actually agree with what Dr. Luana Araújo said in that news article. That's why I think it's hilarious that of all the dumb things he said and did he went down for his perfectly valid criticism of the electronic voting machines.

Xunjin 3y ago
At least in the pandemic, you seem to be reasonable. In many posts, you have shown no knowledge of Law concepts and how our constitution works. I hope in the future, before you say a “judge is being a dictator”, you study about the matter. IANAL, and yet I'm capable to see how you don't know about the typical and atypical functions of each power in our Democracy. I hope this link could expand your superficial knowledge about the matter. https://www.jusbrasil.com.br/noticias/podem-os-juizes-legislar/3040265 https://www.jusbrasil.com.br/noticias/podem-os-juizes-legisl...
- matheusmoreira 3y ago
  What constitution? The one the judges selectively apply? The one that explicitly says the political censorship they perpetrated is unconstitutional? You're apparently incapable of seeing the fact that the judges have essentially given themselves power to legislate, investigate and judge. They've been doing it ever since one particular publication attacked them and they show no signs of stopping any time soon. It was painfully obvious during the election but it started much earlier than that. https://www.conjur.com.br/2022-nov-27/inquerito-fake-news-stf-relacao-justica https://www.conjur.com.br/2022-nov-27/inquerito-fake-news-st... If you can't see this, it's pointless to continue this thread.