2 ms·
People are interested because of the possibility of an architecture for AGI. A system capable of generalizing to all types of problems and also being able to le
by Difwif 3y ago
People are interested because of the possibility of an architecture for AGI. A system capable of generalizing to all types of problems and also being able to leverage everything you said as a tool (or even build the tool) is extremely valuable.
We're not even close to this result yet but LLMs seem the closest.
- fnordpiglet 3y agoI agree, but I think there’s an overly large emphasis on picking at LLMs (in)ability to reason in a structured way independent of its semantic language expectation model. It’s usually used as a “see LLM sucks” while the other side holds to “see it can do everything.” Neither is right. LLMs are amazing, but they can’t do everything, even if they can seem to do many things most of the time. While interesting to investigate the boundaries, I think the passion should be more directed towards “how do we wire the piece together and for what and where”