Agree, there are the usual suspects. For small companies the rules, especially on cookies, are intimidating and therefore ignored - however because are small s

Agree, there are the usual suspects. For small companies the rules, especially on cookies, are intimidating and therefore ignored - however because are small so is the impact of it. For larger companies, the financial incentive to bend the privacy rules is significant. And there are the evilCorps like Uber who have a trample the rules strategy [0] (and any platform that abuses workers rights). Not sure how this relates to privacy rules, but it feeds the assumption that if a company ignores one set of rules, they are also inclined to break other rules. An interesting niche I have worked in, social enterprises, a lot of people have a strong moral high ground feeling. Their message is supposedly not commercial, or it has importance while in fact it is still commercial (fund raising, an event, ...). And especially these companies get a lot of attention. [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Controversies_involving_Uber#:~:text=Ignoring%20and%20evading%20local%20regulations,-Uber%20has%20been&text=Uber's%20strategy%20was%20generally%20to,would%20pay%20for%20any%20citations https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Controversies_involving_Uber#:....