3 ms·
https://helpx.adobe.com/fonts/using/font-licensing.html#web-client https://helpx.adobe.com/fonts/using/font-licensing.html#web-... This is a good example of wh
by basch 3y ago
https://helpx.adobe.com/fonts/using/font-licensing.html#web-client https://helpx.adobe.com/fonts/using/font-licensing.html#web-...
This is a good example of where it would be beneficial for cloud bundles to behave a little more like medical insurance in the united states. You start with a lower monthly fee, you pay for what you use up to a maximum, and then hit the cap.
It lets someone buy a subscription for just one thing like fonts, and then by the time you are using three to four products the suite covers itself.
All of that should happen automatically without getting stuck in a subpar tier for year, or being unable to downsize when you stop using a product.
- parkersweb 3y agoIt's the weirdness of the fact that the client has to buy a completely unrelated product in order to get the thing they need. Typekit used to cost around £50/year - and allowed agencies to use webfonts on their client sites. Now the clients have to spend £26.50 / month on a product they don't actually need in order to get a font on their website...
- basch 3y agoWas $50/year a loss to grow the business? Did that actually cover the under the covers licensing cost? The font in question is considerably more expensive on its own. From an intuition standpoint, I would NOT expect my license of web fonts to extend to a client I’m selling my work to. My null hypothesis would be that there is an additional license to acquire.