3 ms·
This is also likely tied to the age population bomb https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fendo.2021.706532/full https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10
by chaostheory 3y ago
This is also likely tied to the age population bomb
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fendo.2021.706532/full https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fendo.2021.7065...
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5479690/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5479690/
There are plenty of papers with similar conclusions.
Endocrine disrupters aren’t limited to BPA. “BPA free” items often contain other endocrine disrupters like BPS. It’s almost impossible to avoid some form of it now. It’s in food packaging, paper receipts, clothes, and much more. That’s ignoring other classes of pollutants like PFAS which you can find on cookware, clothing, and even dental floss.
I predict that artificial insemination will likely become more the norm in the future
Edit: let’s pretend that we can magically remove these pollutants from all new products in every country starting now. That still won’t eliminate the problem because it’s still in the environment and animals have been ingesting it. there is also giant source of it in the middle of the Pacific
- xgl5k 3y agoNot only would the problem persist if we can magically remove these pollutants from all new products in every country starting now, but it would continue to get worse. The plastic in the pacific takes decades to break down. Every decade since the 50s we've produced more and more plastic. So its like a ticking time bomb, there's going to be more and more microplastics in the environment.
- bavell 3y agoI can't help but wonder if these are contributing to the growing gender confusion in kids.