3 ms·
It would be even better if the code was always valid because we only edit the AST itself, like what paredit does for Lisp modes.
by globular-toast 3y ago
It would be even better if the code was always valid because we only edit the AST itself, like what paredit does for Lisp modes.
- morelisp 3y agoNo. (The code being valid s-sexps doesn’t even guarantee it’s syntactically valid after macro expansion, but even if it does this is a bad idea.)