3 ms·
I am going to give this a shot but I am not sure what's the attraction anymore with Copilot + LSP. - Auto-completion: However smart it is, it can't beat copilo
by csomar 3y ago
I am going to give this a shot but I am not sure what's the attraction anymore with Copilot + LSP.
- Auto-completion: However smart it is, it can't beat copilot.
- Type information: LSP can do that. (along with access to docs, error/warning highlighting, etc..)
- Debugger: There isn't a good one (or at least a good one that can be easily configured) for neovim yet. That's something I really miss for my toolbox.
- Cargo.toml: There is already a neovim plugin for that!
- VCS: I don't mind having a separate app for VC. But there isn't a good GUI app for Linux.
So far, it's only two points I am interested in; and only the debugger is the thing that I miss the most. I am wondering if better debugging tools (like LSP) somehow make it to Rust (along with maybe ownership/lifetime LSP like tools), then the market for an IDE becomes null?
- adamzochowski 3y agoSublime merge runs on linux. Why is it not a good git gui?
- raincole 3y ago> - Auto-completion: However smart it is, it can't beat copilot. That's news for me! I write C# in Rider and I'm a copilot subscriber. However if I have to choose between Rider's auto-completion and Copilot, then the choice is painfully obvious.
- bibabaloo 3y agoJetBrains IDEs have support for copilot: https://docs.github.com/en/copilot/getting-started-with-github-copilot?tool=jetbrains https://docs.github.com/en/copilot/getting-started-with-gith...
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]