4 ms·

You are spreading misinformation, read your own comment, here is an example: "[...]designed to justify the judiciary dictatorship we're currently living under.

by Xunjin 3y ago

You are spreading misinformation, read your own comment, here is an example: "[...]designed to justify the judiciary dictatorship we're currently living under." That's literally the fake news spread in far-right media, which seems you are consuming too much. Just because you don't agree with a decision done by the Supreme Court on Brazil (STF) doesn't mean it's a dictatorship. If you feel I caused any damage to you by point facts in your commentaries, you have the right to sue me, and I will have all the instances of defense garantee by our constitution :)

matheusmoreira 3y ago
I don't need media to see and understand what's happening. That the "far-right" apparently agrees with me on this point doesn't prove that it's fake either. The supreme court has been grabbing power for years now and last year during the elections they committed blatantly unconstitutional acts in defense of their candidate including censorship the likes of which haven't been seen in this country since the military dictatorship. You expect me to believe this is not a judiciary dictatorship when these unelected judges are essentially running the country? Just today news came out saying they more or less created a tax. > I will have all the instances of defense garantee by our constitution :) What a joke. There is no constitution in this country. There's only the judge-king's whims. Whatever he writes on his paper is law. If I were to sue you, I'd succeed only in getting myself persecuted. So I'll flag your posts and stop responding to you. Goodbye.
- Xunjin 3y ago
  Once more you are spreading misinformation and denying the reality. > There is no constitution in this country. There is and was promulgated in 1988.[0] > The supreme court has been grabbing power for years now and last year during the elections they committed blatantly unconstitutional acts in defense of their candidate including censorship the likes of which haven't been seen in this country since the military dictatorship. The TSE, the court you are referring to alongside with social medias, removed around three hundreds posts containing fake news, that so small that yet 79% Brazilians had contact with fake news[1], how is that a dictatorship? You are downplaying the dictatorship that happened in 1964 on Brazil. People were exiled/killed, ALL media were censored. I beg anyone who wants to know more about the coup of 64 read the wikipedia page is a good start on the subject, you will see how horrible and bloody it was. Link: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_dictatorship_in_Brazil https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_dictatorship_in_Bra... These references are in Brazilian Portuguese language, I'm sorry for it. [0] https://pt.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitui%C3%A7%C3%A3o_brasileira_de_1988 https://pt.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitui%C3%A7%C3%A3o_brasi... [1] https://www.terra.com.br/byte/tse-nao-conseguiu-barrar-fake-news-veja-erros-e-acertos-nas-eleicoes,53c559f52b780006c714771c873b59cb6mzqyaxt.html https://www.terra.com.br/byte/tse-nao-conseguiu-barrar-fake-...

by Xunjin 3y ago

matheusmoreira 3y ago

I don't need media to see and understand what's happening. That the "far-right" apparently agrees with me on this point doesn't prove that it's fake either. The supreme court has been grabbing power for years now and last year during the elections they committed blatantly unconstitutional acts in defense of their candidate including censorship the likes of which haven't been seen in this country since the military dictatorship. You expect me to believe this is not a judiciary dictatorship when these unelected judges are essentially running the country? Just today news came out saying they more or less created a tax. > I will have all the instances of defense garantee by our constitution :) What a joke. There is no constitution in this country. There's only the judge-king's whims. Whatever he writes on his paper is law. If I were to sue you, I'd succeed only in getting myself persecuted. So I'll flag your posts and stop responding to you. Goodbye.

Xunjin 3y ago
Once more you are spreading misinformation and denying the reality. > There is no constitution in this country. There is and was promulgated in 1988.[0] > The supreme court has been grabbing power for years now and last year during the elections they committed blatantly unconstitutional acts in defense of their candidate including censorship the likes of which haven't been seen in this country since the military dictatorship. The TSE, the court you are referring to alongside with social medias, removed around three hundreds posts containing fake news, that so small that yet 79% Brazilians had contact with fake news[1], how is that a dictatorship? You are downplaying the dictatorship that happened in 1964 on Brazil. People were exiled/killed, ALL media were censored. I beg anyone who wants to know more about the coup of 64 read the wikipedia page is a good start on the subject, you will see how horrible and bloody it was. Link: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_dictatorship_in_Brazil https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_dictatorship_in_Bra... These references are in Brazilian Portuguese language, I'm sorry for it. [0] https://pt.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitui%C3%A7%C3%A3o_brasileira_de_1988 https://pt.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitui%C3%A7%C3%A3o_brasi... [1] https://www.terra.com.br/byte/tse-nao-conseguiu-barrar-fake-news-veja-erros-e-acertos-nas-eleicoes,53c559f52b780006c714771c873b59cb6mzqyaxt.html https://www.terra.com.br/byte/tse-nao-conseguiu-barrar-fake-...