I don’t see talking eye to eye to your second in command or to one of your trustful advisors as a 1:1. Of course that the first kind of discussion is quite old,

I don’t see talking eye to eye to your second in command or to one of your trustful advisors as a 1:1. Of course that the first kind of discussion is quite old, today’s 1:1s are a different thing, at least when it comes to they’re seen in the corporate and tech world. And back to your question, no, I don’t think that Zhukov or Napoleon had 1:1s with their second people in command, I don’t think they were laying down advancement opportunities nore were those people asked about how do they feel and what’s troubling them about the team (the army in this case).