What's really funny is that you used "Stockholm syndrome" to (not) make a point about who's able to tell friend from foe. You do know that the term is associate

What's really funny is that you used "Stockholm syndrome" to (not) make a point about who's able to tell friend from foe. You do know that the term is associated with fraud and sexism, right? https://cryingoutforjustice.blog/2015/06/03/the-myth-of-stockholm-syndrome-and-how-it-was-invented-to-silence-an-indignant-young-woman/ https://cryingoutforjustice.blog/2015/06/03/the-myth-of-stoc... Your characterizations of interlocutors as "hysterical" and not normal are no better. It's a level of defensiveness rarely seen in people confident of having facts on their side. GP was right to mention denial.