3 ms·

> It's have nothing to do with licensing. I disagree there. Licensing is still a huge issue with incorporating a console SDK. Each one plays by their own ball

> It's have nothing to do with licensing. I disagree there. Licensing is still a huge issue with incorporating a console SDK. Each one plays by their own ball game, and it will take a tremendous amount of effort to work through the legal, business, and licensing issues for each platform. And once that's resolved, you'll still need to provide an avenue for end-users to obtain and hook up the SDK to the open source engine which sounds like quite the engineering effort to simplify it. Edit: And it looks like Godot is pulling it off quite well, thank you for the link to their blog post

cxr 3y ago
The fact that Godot Foundation doesn't/can't provide certification or support for console integration is not the same thing as "Godot can't be used for console development", let alone "Godot can't be used for console development[...] due to open source licensing issues". It's not (A)GPLv3. Godot is MIT licensed. Godot can be used for console development—just like _any_ other piece of MIT-licensed code you want to build your game with. It's just that doing so is (read: remains) an undertaking that you have to deal with on your own, since Godot Foundation doesn't offer anything besides the Godot engine source code under compatible license terms. There's nothing particular about Godot or its license here. From the documentation you yourself linked to: > Regardless of the engine used to create the game, the process to publish a game to a console platform is as follows: [painful and/or expensive and/or time-consuming process]
- prophesi 3y ago
  I think you're getting worked up that I said Godot can't be used for console development, when I really just meant that it can't be used for console development _currently_. I noted that they were working on this in my original comment, and as your blog post shows, it's going well. For posterity, here's Godot's post a year or so ago on the struggles they've had with console middleware over the years. https://godotengine.org/article/godot-consoles-all-you-need-know/ https://godotengine.org/article/godot-consoles-all-you-need-...
  - cxr 3y ago
    Making the point that Godot-the-toolchain-and/or-organization can't be put to direct use to get a release-ready binary for consoles saying "Godot can't be used for console development[...] due to open source licensing issues" is, in a word, reckless. It sows uncertainty and doubt about the suitability of the project for use on consoles. Getting a game released to consoles that was developed with Godot is no more difficult than getting one released that was developed with your own proprietary engine; there's nothing related to the license that plays a part here.
    - prophesi 3y ago
      I think we'll just have to agree to disagree. There are a lot more hoops you have to jump through if you're keeping your engine actually open source.
      - deleted 3y ago
        [deleted]

cxr 3y ago

The fact that Godot Foundation doesn't/can't provide certification or support for console integration is not the same thing as "Godot can't be used for console development", let alone "Godot can't be used for console development[...] due to open source licensing issues". It's not (A)GPLv3. Godot is MIT licensed. Godot can be used for console development—just like _any_ other piece of MIT-licensed code you want to build your game with. It's just that doing so is (read: remains) an undertaking that you have to deal with on your own, since Godot Foundation doesn't offer anything besides the Godot engine source code under compatible license terms. There's nothing particular about Godot or its license here. From the documentation you yourself linked to: > Regardless of the engine used to create the game, the process to publish a game to a console platform is as follows: [painful and/or expensive and/or time-consuming process]

prophesi 3y ago
I think you're getting worked up that I said Godot can't be used for console development, when I really just meant that it can't be used for console development _currently_. I noted that they were working on this in my original comment, and as your blog post shows, it's going well. For posterity, here's Godot's post a year or so ago on the struggles they've had with console middleware over the years. https://godotengine.org/article/godot-consoles-all-you-need-know/ https://godotengine.org/article/godot-consoles-all-you-need-...
- cxr 3y ago
  Making the point that Godot-the-toolchain-and/or-organization can't be put to direct use to get a release-ready binary for consoles saying "Godot can't be used for console development[...] due to open source licensing issues" is, in a word, reckless. It sows uncertainty and doubt about the suitability of the project for use on consoles. Getting a game released to consoles that was developed with Godot is no more difficult than getting one released that was developed with your own proprietary engine; there's nothing related to the license that plays a part here.
  - prophesi 3y ago
    I think we'll just have to agree to disagree. There are a lot more hoops you have to jump through if you're keeping your engine actually open source.
    - deleted 3y ago
      [deleted]