4 ms·
Thanks for your work! I first encountered strictyaml years ago and have used it, happily. I especially appreciate that you made clear arguments for what ought
by AndyKluger 3y ago
Thanks for your work!
I first encountered strictyaml years ago and have used it, happily. I especially appreciate that you made clear arguments for what ought to be excluded from a configuration format itself, and how proper validation ultimately requires real code anyway.
I was always disappointed however that your project didn't amount to a formal specification (at least at the time, unsure if that's changed).
More recently I came to know and love NestedText, which seems very close to what a strictyaml spec could be/have been. I'm curious if you've engaged with that project/format, and what you think of it.
- hitchstory 3y ago>I was always disappointed however that your project didn't amount to a formal specification (at least at the time, unsure if that's changed). I would dearly love to do this. I would ideally like to work with somebody who can help me though because it's a lot of work and I struggle to find the time.
- AndyKluger 3y agoNestedText seems very close to what a strictyaml spec could be/have been. I'm curious if you've engaged with that project/format, and what you think of it.