3 ms·
You could cut to the chase and point out what isn't open source. Also, if that source is available, you could point out which definition of open source you are
by LanceH 3y ago
You could cut to the chase and point out what isn't open source. Also, if that source is available, you could point out which definition of open source you are going by.
Oh, and please don't say "the standard definition", because that is definitely contested, even after all these years.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- cxr 3y ago> You could cut to the chase and point out what isn't open source. That's easy: Defold (the project linked here). > Also, if that source is available, you could point out which definition of open source you are going by. That's easy, too: I'm using the same definition that the Defold developers are using.