> The entirety of your post above is comprised of sentences that cannot be tested by science. I've literally given you a falsifiability test. Most of my senten

> The entirety of your post above is comprised of sentences that cannot be tested by science. I've literally given you a falsifiability test. Most of my sentences are not "claims", only claims can be tested, and all of my claims can. > Since science is rooted in mathematics and logic, hopefully you at least admit of the possibilities of truths there Honestly this makes it clear you're not even reading my full comments, because I address this directly. Whatevs, nobody is obligated to read what I write, but if you haven't read it, why reply? > if you spend some time learning about these things and actually think them through > the kind of blundered epistemology and philosophy of science folks who haven't studied the topics repeat Gatekeeping and personal attacks. It takes a lot of hubris to believe that anyone who has reached a different conclusion than you must have not studied the subjects. "Well if you actually thought about this, you'd realize..." has never convinced anyone of anything except that you're clearly not worth talking to.