4 ms·

> No. There is no evidence that people are at an increased risk of cardiac arrest in the days or weeks following the Covid-19 vaccine. Plenty of people online

by pleoxy 3y ago

> No. There is no evidence that people are at an increased risk of cardiac arrest in the days or weeks following the Covid-19 vaccine. Plenty of people online say otherwise. Including right here on this story. Numerous young and previously healthy people with heart problems post vaccine. Personal accounts abound. When they bring it up to the experts who are suppose to be tracking this stuff, instead of listening to them and being concerned they are ignored, or gaslit. Apparently you don't have to enter it into evidence and tell people about it if you just ignore it. Confidence in medical science: extremely low.

rewmie 3y ago
> Plenty of people online say otherwise. Including right here on this story. Numerous young and previously healthy people with heart problems post vaccine. Personal accounts abound. You can also find plenty people online saying vaccines include 5G microchips, the british royal family are lizard people, the world is flat, and that fossils are a ruse to shift the world's attention away from the existence of falling angels. > When they bring it up to the experts who are suppose to be tracking this stuff, instead of listening to them and being concerned they are ignored, or gaslit. I wonder why loonies expressing crackpot theories are ignored by the world. > Apparently you don't have to enter it into evidence and tell people about it if you just ignore it. It's quite amusing that you talk about evidence, as these loonies reiterating crackpot theories outright reject any evidence but somehow expect the world to blindly accept their baseless claims as indisputable facts.
- pleoxy 3y ago
  > You can also find plenty people online saying vaccines include 5G microchips, the british royal family are lizard people, the world is flat, and that fossils are a ruse to shift the world's attention away from the existence of falling angels. Straw man... So you can't find any truth online because someone has told a bad fish tale somewhere? So you can just lump anything you don't like into a crap bucket and stop thinking. Nuance, evidences, reason and logic are all just irrelevant because, well, there is this giant crap bucket!! Back on topic... Go to any front line medical personnel. Nurses, doctors, doesn't matter. Tell them you know someone who claims to have been vaccine injured by the COVID vaccines and is worried about the booster and ask them what they think. How many encourage the person to report their condition and get it investigated? How many dismiss the concern because vaccines are safe? If they were interested in truth and safety, potential side effects would be treated with concern and care. To at least look at it, acknowledge the possibility. You know, get answers to questions that every researcher or scientist should want. Or... If they are more interested in the narrative, it will look more like the later dismissal. No questions allowed. It's an exercise anyone can do. And it will tell you quite plainly if we are getting honest reporting on potential issues from the vaccines. Because... You can't find what you filter out of your data set.

by pleoxy 3y ago

rewmie 3y ago

> Plenty of people online say otherwise. Including right here on this story. Numerous young and previously healthy people with heart problems post vaccine. Personal accounts abound. You can also find plenty people online saying vaccines include 5G microchips, the british royal family are lizard people, the world is flat, and that fossils are a ruse to shift the world's attention away from the existence of falling angels. > When they bring it up to the experts who are suppose to be tracking this stuff, instead of listening to them and being concerned they are ignored, or gaslit. I wonder why loonies expressing crackpot theories are ignored by the world. > Apparently you don't have to enter it into evidence and tell people about it if you just ignore it. It's quite amusing that you talk about evidence, as these loonies reiterating crackpot theories outright reject any evidence but somehow expect the world to blindly accept their baseless claims as indisputable facts.

pleoxy 3y ago
> You can also find plenty people online saying vaccines include 5G microchips, the british royal family are lizard people, the world is flat, and that fossils are a ruse to shift the world's attention away from the existence of falling angels. Straw man... So you can't find any truth online because someone has told a bad fish tale somewhere? So you can just lump anything you don't like into a crap bucket and stop thinking. Nuance, evidences, reason and logic are all just irrelevant because, well, there is this giant crap bucket!! Back on topic... Go to any front line medical personnel. Nurses, doctors, doesn't matter. Tell them you know someone who claims to have been vaccine injured by the COVID vaccines and is worried about the booster and ask them what they think. How many encourage the person to report their condition and get it investigated? How many dismiss the concern because vaccines are safe? If they were interested in truth and safety, potential side effects would be treated with concern and care. To at least look at it, acknowledge the possibility. You know, get answers to questions that every researcher or scientist should want. Or... If they are more interested in the narrative, it will look more like the later dismissal. No questions allowed. It's an exercise anyone can do. And it will tell you quite plainly if we are getting honest reporting on potential issues from the vaccines. Because... You can't find what you filter out of your data set.