3 ms·
I have a Samsung watch without cellular but with bluetooth communications instead. Can someone eloborate what the difference is between celluar connections and
by ecmascript 3y ago
I have a Samsung watch without cellular but with bluetooth communications instead.
Can someone eloborate what the difference is between celluar connections and other wireless tech like headless phones or watches? Is there any difference except strength etc.
Never believed it before, but suddently the thought of wireless technologies being bad gave me a reality check and I realized I have never questioned it.
- mceachen 3y agoBluetooth is also non-ionizing. The frequency is close frequency to WiFi: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bluetooth#Health_concerns https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bluetooth#Health_concerns
- wkat4242 3y agoThere's a difference mainly in "strength" (transmit power). The frequencies and modulations used are not all that different. In terms of radio energy, bluetooth is the lowest, then wifi and then cellular.