3 ms·
The "that" was referring to the regulation of 4W/kg for non-ionizing radiations in consumer electronics, not the sun Maybe the phrasing was ambiguous
by sebstefan 3y ago
The "that" was referring to the regulation of 4W/kg for non-ionizing radiations in consumer electronics, not the sun
Maybe the phrasing was ambiguous
- stinos 3y agoOh, right, yes I interpreted it the other way. Sorry but too late to edit or delete my comment..