3 ms·
I'm not sure narrow roads in old cities are due to lack of planning, they didn't have crystal balls
by secretsatan 3y ago
I'm not sure narrow roads in old cities are due to lack of planning, they didn't have crystal balls
- arethuza 3y agoAnd some of the "planning" that was done to make our cities car friendly was absolutely horrific - look at what someone thought was a good idea for Edinburgh: https://www.gcat.org.uk/blog/?p=682 https://www.gcat.org.uk/blog/?p=682 Edit: thankfully never built!
- yrro 3y agoSee Glascow's M8 which did get built!
- mytailorisrich 3y agoNarrow roads are not only found in old cities... They are everywhere.
- secretsatan 3y agoBut still for historical reasons, towns, villages, country lanes have been around far longer than cars
- citrin_ru 3y agoWhen most roads/streets are narrow it makes it acceptable to plan new ones narrow too. I live in a neighbourhood built in a green (farm) field in 1990s - residential street are wide enough for two compact cars to pass each other but nowadays half of the street used for parking (for lack of better places).
- tstrimple 3y agoNarrow roads should be a sign of planning. They do a far better job of restricting vehicle speeds than a nice wide open straight road with a 25mph (or equivalent) speed limit sign. My US city would benefit from far more narrow roads. But even the “quaint and quiet” residential streets are so wide that cars feel comfortable flying through at double the speed limit. And I’m not talking about the occasional reckless driver. This is how the standard traffic flows because they have so much space and open sight lines. We have nothing in the way of traffic calming for pedestrian interactions. Posted speed limits are the only mechanism used to designate road speed. It doesn’t work.